12 live sources connected
Structured research / 12

Research agents need today’s data.
Not yesterday’s weights.

Route a question to current specialist services, keep the source-specific limits visible, join the structured results locally, and return a brief that separates live evidence from model interpretation.

Source observatoryUpdated 14:32 UTC
papersmarketsgeosecurityP
ScientificCrossref · arXivlive
MarketsSEC · FREDlive
GeographicOverture · OSMlive
SecurityCVE · NVDlive
ReferenceWikidatalive
5 source classesStructured outputsProvenance retained
Research brief / generatedQuestion Q-1842

Where are grid-storage projects accelerating, and what changed this quarter?

A structured answer joins current project filings, geographic records, market indicators, and recent papers while preserving the limits of each source.

Live facts
18 cited records
Interpretation
Separated
Coverage gaps
2 flagged
Evidence packet attached →
Output, not a data dump

Current evidence.
Visible provenance.

Research agents need current prices, filings, weather, geographic facts, scientific records, vulnerabilities, and other changing data. Integrating each upstream independently creates a long tail of keys, schemas, and error handling. Pilot’s specialist directory normalizes discovery and common commands while keeping each data source’s scope and upstream limitations visible.

Specialist surfaces

Route each question
to the source that owns it.

Source class 01Discover

Specialists by category

Find services across reference, science, government, finance, news, transit, security, health, and other domains.

DISCOVER
Source class 02Query

Structured command surfaces

Common help, data, summary, and JSON conventions reduce the amount of bespoke tool knowledge an agent needs.

QUERY
Source class 03Analyze

Compose with search and local data

Cosift, DuckDB, databases, and market-intelligence apps turn live observations into a larger research workflow.

COMPOSE
Live-source planner

Map the live evidence behind
one research question.

Give us a question whose answer changes over time. We will identify candidate specialist services, structured joins, document context, and source-health caveats.

What you get
  1. 01Candidate specialists
  2. 02Join and analysis path
  3. 03Evidence and freshness model
Start with one real workflowAbout 2 minutes

Do not include credentials, secrets, or customer data. By submitting, you agree that Pilot may use this information to respond. Privacy Policy.

Research assembly

The brief shows its work.

  1. 01

    Find the relevant specialist

    Search the live directory by capability or domain rather than starting from a vendor list.

  2. 02

    Inspect its current command surface

    Use the service help response to understand parameters and available data.

  3. 03

    Collect structured results

    Query one or several specialists while retaining source-specific status and limits.

  4. 04

    Ground and analyze

    Combine live data with indexed knowledge or local analytical tools for the final result.

Technical basis

Specific product surfaces.
Inspectable in the docs.

Product reviewPilot release 1.13.9Inspect documentation
  • 01Hundreds of directory service records
  • 02Dozens of specialist categories
  • 03Common help and structured-data conventions
  • 04Composition with Cosift and local databases